13 comments on “Liked The Hunger Games? Try Battle Royale – it’s better.

  1. I feel like some sort of weirdo for having absolutely zero interest in either story. Everyone I know is either watching or reading THG but me? Eh. It’s not that violence turns me off, (a look at any of my top 10 lists proves that) but something about the desperation of children fighting for their lives leaves a bad feeling in my gut. Lord of the Flies was hard for me to read for similar reasons.

    I miss the Revue sometimes. I go in occasionally but I don’t know anyone there and the employees are all snooty like we were and I wanna be all “I was a Book Revue Snob first bitch!”.

    • I feel ultra weird abut going back inside Book Revue now, even though I left on good terms with Rich and Bobby, for a lot of the same reasons – I don’t think there’s hardly anyone left that I remember. Shame, because we had a lot of fun. I still have that picture of you, me, and Derick clustered around Bruce Campbell, by the way!

      • that was an awesome night :) Meeting Neil Gaiman rated slightly above that. I just didn’t appreciate how awesome it was to work there at the time.

  2. It’s funny, I saw the trailers for the Hunger Games and was like, meh. Then I saw the trailer for Battle Royale and was like HOLY FUCK I MUST SEE THIS MOVIE!!! Maybe I’m just an extremely disturbed individual….

    • You are disturbed, but in a good way.

      The book is great, it goes into a hell of a lot more detail, but it’s long as a motherfucker – we’re talking 800 pages or so. Most of the time the entire chapter is spent in describing a character, going into his or her backstory, getting into their psychology – and then killing them in a gruesome manner. The movie might be slightly more fun.

  3. Loved Battle Royale when I first saw it however long ago (before DVDs, too. It was weird laser disk thing, but not laser disk.) I had no idea it was a book.

    Another good Children in Competition to the Death Dystopian (Shortened hereafter to CCDD) is The Long Walk. Coincidentally, it’s also by Stephen King. Basically the kids walk till they drop. Or they slow below 4 mph and get gunned down by soldiers.

    Last one standing is the winner. The interesting part about it is that the sport is America’s national past time, and the kids apply to join. The kids apply to join. Why would anyone willingly play something that’s been proven to be pretty fucking fatal?

    Oh. Right.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_issues_in_American_football

  4. Pingback: There are only two stories that have ever been told | Fighting Monkey Press

  5. I was actually dragged out to the hunger games, and I started out against it because I’d read Battle Royale. If I hadn’t, I honestly think I could have super enjoyed the movie, aside some of the… clunky romance and a gag-reflex of Mary Sue. It really wasn’t that terrible. And it was different enough from Battle Royale that I didn’t want to cut off whatever reproductive organs a movie might have and make it choke on them.

    Haven’t read the book though, so I’m a bad judge.

    • I really think it’s a case of parallel evolution rather than one ripping off the other. Still, I prefer Battle Royale over Hunger Games. Then again, The Running Man is pretty good too – the novella, not the AHNOLD movie.

      • That makes a lot of sense. It was enjoyable, and there were some heart-in-throat moments I’m told come across far better in the book. It’s supposedly a simple read, I’d consider picking it up for some kill-time simple stuff.

  6. Pingback: BATTLE ROYALE « Written in Blood

  7. Pingback: The sincerest form of flattery? « Amateur Professional

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s